Rhombic polyhedra in the work of Kepler

3 October 2025

The #Mathober 2025 day 3 prompt is ‘Polyhedron’. I thought I would use the occasion to draw attention to a lesser-known role of polyhedra in Johannes Kepler’s (1571–1630) thought.

Start with the famous part: Kepler argued that the five regular (or Platonic) solids fitted between the orbs of the then-known six planets:

Kepler's diagram showing how the five regular solids fit between the orbs of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn

When Galileo discovered four moons of Jupiter, Kepler sought a similar polyhedral structure for the Jovian system, and suggested that ‘semiregular’ solids provided the key. ‘Semiregular’ for Kepler meant that the polyhedra had rhombic faces and satisfied certain technical criteria. (The concept differs from today’s notion of semiregular polyhedra.)

There were exactly three such ‘semiregular’ polyhedra:

A rhombic dodecahedron: a polyhedron with 12 rhombic faces; 6 vertices with 4 incident faces, 8 vertices with 3 incident faces.

A rhombic triacontahedron: a polyhedron with 30 rhombic faces; 20 vertices with 3 incident faces, 12 vertices with 5 incident faces.

Kepler placed the rhombic dodecahedron between Io and Europa, the rhombic triacontahedron between Europa and Ganymede, and the cube between Ganymede and Callisto.

Kepler thought that there were six planets because God had shaped the cosmos around the five platonic solids. The three ‘semiregular’ solids would similarly explain why there were four moons of Jupiter.

References

  1. J. V. Field. Kepler’s Geometrical Cosmology. Bloomsbury, 2013. ISBN978-1-4725-0703‑7. pp. 79–80, 218–19.

  2. J. Kepler, Gesammelte Werke, vol. VII: Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae. Edited by M. Caspar. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1953. pp. 318–19.

  3. A. J. Cain, Form & Number: A History of Mathematical Beauty. Lisbon, 2024. pp. 292–3.

Image sources

«
Geometrical mosaic from the Alhambra
‘Form & Number’ in print
»